Mistakes to Avoid while considering DevOps transformation

Mistakes to Avoid while considering DevOps transformation

Learn about the common mistakes to avoid while considering DevOps transformation with our devops developers. Discover how to streamline your processes, enhance efficiency, and ensure a successful DevOps journey by steering clear of common pitfalls. 

One of the most asked questions we get in corporate DevOps and agile transformation projects is, "what struggles the businesses have faced in their transformation attempts, and how can we learn from their mistakes?"  

This has motivated a brief list of the most troublesome "anti-patterns" of transformation and modernizing efforts, together with ideas for overcoming these inclinations. An anti-pattern is a regularly occurring pattern of behavior, procedure, or structure that first seems advantageous but finally has more negative effects than beneficial ones. 

DevOps relies on coupling operations and development to automate tasks and solve problems. Despite its proven benefits, we can learn a lot from those who have embraced DevOps. Benefits of adopting DevOps include increased efficiency, improved collaboration, and faster delivery times. 

DevOps Transformation Mistakes 

Mistakes to avoid during DevOps transformation: DevOps implementation mistakes that IT businesses and their clients need to learn from. 

Error #1: The first mistake is assuming that people, processes, or technology are either/or. 

Enterprises must enhance three areas: people, processes, and technology, if they are to meet the demands of contemporary software development and delivery. 

Your corporate culture is defined by people and systems, which is why they are inseparable. Separated systems, for instance, cause teams—like Dev and Operations—to differ sharply. Monolithic architectures, physical servers, and waterfall approaches are among other conventional methods and technologies. 

Modern methods, on the other hand, incorporate a product-focused attitude and group teams. Agile processes—like ubiquitous automation and ongoing delivery—should be used more and more. At last, new technologies should be embraced, like cloud computing, containers, microservices, APIs, and serverless. Any size company has people, procedures, and technology spanning the conventional and contemporary spectrums. 

The error comes from obsessing too much on one or two of these. Companies trying to boil the ocean won't get the desired outcomes.  

DevOps calls for all three: a change in culture, combining devops with agile methods, and the acceptance of new technology. 

Organizations cannot build a cooperative and product-centric character without this strategic approach. Teams are pleased that their internal and external clients may reach their target of an always-flowing supply of fresh capabilities, improvements, and problem fixes. 

Error #2: Considering Dev or Ops 

Many times, companies want to know if operations-oriented or development-oriented methods apply. This often stems from a conflict between the objectives of operations and development. 

Developers want to create programs, link systems, and move fast. Conversely, operations teams demand stability, security, and control—qualities not usually connected with speed. 

Companies make mistakes when they choose to concentrate just on development or devote all of their resources to operations. Encouragement of cooperation between these two DevOps teams is the aim. Organizations that acknowledge the friction and divide between Dev and Ops and reward team cooperation will help to accomplish this. 

Everyone is there to accomplish the same objective: rapidly create and implement high-quality software while lowering risk and expense to help the company and pleasure end users. 

Error #3: One-size-fits-all adoption 

Efforts at DevOps transformation most clearly show this third anti-pattern—one-size-fits-all adoption. This strategy has several flaws.  

First of all, it usually has little effect. Second, DevOps is an evolving effort, and it's not to be taken as a task for completion or compliance. Third, and most importantly, depending on the individual objectives, goals, present status, and problems of every given app or value stream, DevOps comprises a multitude of ideas, techniques, tools, and concepts that may and should be deployed judiciously and in order of importance. This is the exception, not the norm; there are some DevOps principles and tools that would make sense to use generally.  

Unless, of course, the company just wants to claim it has completed a DevOps or agile transformation but isn't really interested in the results. The trick is not to assume teams must obediently comply with and "check the box." 

Error #4: Focusing only on cost reduction  

For every IT acquisition or procedure, the bottom line comes first in conversation. While DevOps investments initially appear costly and intimidating, they can quickly yield a return on investment. The reduction of manual work and scripting is one of the main DevOps benefits. Less manual work definitely lowers expenses and guarantees fewer human mistakes. By means of fewer deployment-related mistakes and consequent debugging, this lowers the risk of deployment-related disruptions across environments and saves time. 

Automaton also speeds up and increases the frequency of software distribution. This keeps you current with the industry at large and your rivals, which are accelerating constantly. 

A reduction in manual, tiresome tasks improves employee retention and satisfaction. Today, developers may pursue their passion—developing! 

Over time, this savings will help you pay bills. Employees that are happier and more productive have higher outputs; their goods or modifications are better; your end users are happy; and you save on costly onboarding expenses by not employing new staff members. 

Error# 5: Big-Bang transformation 

Another prevalent trend in digital transformation and modernization that we have observed is the attempt by companies to implement "big bang" changes. We know these rarely work and pose major risks. However, companies often attempt them, which can lead to a more significant regression than if they hadn't attempted the change at all. 

Failure to start is the primary cause of failure in DevOps. Though it sounds like a big, scary chore, keep in mind that DevOps refers to several different things. Most businesses find themselves midway on their path. 

Your lack of competitiveness may be causing you to lose business and face challenges in the market. Regarding the investment—time or money—you might be psyching yourself out or overanalyzing the circumstances. 

All of it is about the next action. Stop waiting. Starting is significantly less dangerous than the hazards of doing nothing. One step at a time, in the same direction. Divide the space of problems. Start learning and keep learning as you use fresh DevOps approaches. These steps will soon snowball and provide a fully developed DevOps deployment. 

On the other hand, others may make the mistake of initiating and refining a DevOps strategy and execution using drastic actions, commonly referred to as the "Big Bang Theory." 

This is less prevalent now than it was in the past, as many businesses following this road failed at their implementations. These mistakes made clear the value of a staged strategy. 


Whether you want to start your DevOps path or have already started the implementation process, paying attention to the above factors will help you greatly raise the possibility of project success and lower the possibility of making terrible DevOps blunders. Get in touch with us to simplify matters and enable you to include DevOps into your processes in a few easy steps, free of error. To provide the appropriate DevOps approach for your company, our experienced DevOps team evaluates your business needs, presents development, operation team structure and procedures, and aligns them with the best DevOps tools for success. By meeting all DevOps requirements, we ensure a smooth integration process. Ensure the professional handling of your project by hiring expert DevOps engineers. 


Vinit Sharma, a seasoned technologist with over 21 years of expertise in Open Source, cloud transformation, DevSecOps strategy, and software architecture, is a Technical Architect leading Open Source, DevOps, and Cloud Computing initiatives at Clarion. Holding certifications as an Architect and Business Analyst professional, he specializes in PHP services, including CMS Drupal and Laravel, contributing significantly to the dynamic landscape of content management and web development.

Table of Contents

Talk To Our Experts